New RGJ story that, as far as I can tell, only appears on their online posting site. It is not today’s front-page story. It should be.
“Holland said in the statement there were reasons why she didn’t share details of the situation earlier this week when asked directly about it by the press.
“The District’s counsel discussed the issue with them hoping for resolution that would not harm the District,” she said. “District counsel has provided information to me which I feel shows a reasonable conclusion that at minimum was recklessly negligent supervision and gross misconduct on her part.”
Okay, but knowing what she knew, Ms. Holland, that is, would it have been good for the district IF the matter was resolved in discussion with Ms. Davis’ lawyers and would such resolution kept quiet have been to the benefit of the public? Remember that we still do not know why the Galena administrators were fired. Good for the public?
A meeting will take place at which Ms. Davis’ behavior will be discussed. It will be a public meeting. From the article: ““The District’s counsel discussed the issue with them hoping for resolution that would not harm the District,” she said. “District counsel has provided information to me which I feel shows a reasonable conclusion that at minimum was recklessly negligent supervision and gross misconduct on her part.”
